Grand Theft Auto (1997) Review: Where the Biggest Sandbox in Gaming Began

The Game That Should Not Have Mattered

🎮 This review is part of the The Grand Theft Auto Series – see every mainline GTA ranked and reviewed.

In 1997, a small Scottish studio called DMA Design released a top-down crime game that looked, frankly, like a toy. Tiny cars. Tiny pedestrians. A city viewed from directly overhead, like a road map someone had spilled a box of pixels onto.

Nobody at the time could have told you this was the seed of the most important open-world franchise in gaming.

But it was.

I want to be honest right up front, because that is the whole job here: Grand Theft Auto (1997) is not a good game to sit down and play in 2026. It is crude, it is fiddly, and it is brutally unfair in ways modern players have rightly forgotten. This is a 7, not an 8 or a 9, and the gap between that score and the franchise it spawned is the entire story.

This is a retro piece. A historical visit. We are here to respect a relic, not to pretend it still holds up.

---

What You Actually Did In It

Strip away three decades of nostalgia and the loop is shockingly simple.

You drop into a sprawling city, viewed from above, as a nameless little criminal. You answer ringing phones to pick up jobs. You steal cars, run people over, rob, and generally cause chaos. Every act of mayhem feeds a running score multiplier, and the entire point of the game is to rack up enough points to “pass” the level and move to the next city.

That is it. No cutscenes worth mentioning. No voiced hero. No moral reckoning at sunset.

The genius was not in the polish, because there was none. The genius was in the permission. For the first time, a game handed you a city and said: do whatever you want, however you want, and the only judge is the score counter and the police response you bring down on your own head.

That idea, the open city as a playground for chaos, is the DNA that everything since has been built on.

Ad

Grand Theft Auto: The Trilogy - Definitive Edition (opens in a new tab)

The closest modern on-ramp to GTA's roots. The Trilogy collects the 3D-era classics that grew directly out of this top-down original.

---

The Multiplier Chase: Anarchy With a Scoreboard

The clever hook underneath the chaos was the multiplier.

Causing carnage was not just for fun. Each city tasked you with hitting a target score, and your multiplier climbed as you completed jobs and survived your own spree. A high multiplier turned a modest crime into a fortune of points, which meant the game was constantly nudging you toward bigger, riskier, dumber decisions.

Do you cash out now and stay safe, or push the spree one more block and risk the cops boxing you in?

That tension, the cheap-thrills risk-reward of one more job, is the part of GTA 1 that genuinely still works as a concept. It is pure arcade anarchy with a scoreboard bolted on, and you can feel the future of the series straining inside it. The franchise would eventually trade the score counter for story and freedom, but the underlying jolt, the thrill of getting away with it, was already here.

---

The Cracks: Why It Is a Relic, Not a Classic to Replay

Now the honest part, because anti-hype is the whole brief.

The top-down view was a technical necessity in 1997, and it shows. You are looking at a map, not a world. The city has personality in its layout, but the overhead camera flattens everything into abstraction. When you are driving fast, the screen can barely scroll ahead of you, so you are frequently slamming into things you never saw coming.

The controls are fiddly in the specific way old games are fiddly. Cars turn like shopping trolleys. Aiming on foot is awkward. The character feels less like something you control and more like something you nudge and hope.

And the difficulty is brutal, in the unfair, coin-eating arcade tradition. The police escalate fast and hit hard. One bad turn into a dead end and your whole spree, and your hard-won multiplier, evaporates. There is no gentle on-ramp, no checkpoint generosity, no respect for your time. It was designed for a different era of patience.

These are not nitpicks. They are the reason GTA 1 is a museum piece. You respect it the way you respect an early flip-phone: it changed the world, and you would never carry one again.

---

The Attitude That Outlived the Pixels

Here is what the tiny sprites cannot disguise, and what genuinely lifts this to a 7 rather than something lower: the attitude was fully formed from day one.

GTA 1 was rude. It was gleefully amoral. It handed you a city and dared you to misbehave, and it never once wagged a finger. The dark humor, the cheap thrills, the sense that this was the game your parents would not have approved of, all of it is here, fully present, in a game where the people are six pixels tall.

That voice, that anti-establishment, do-what-you-want swagger, is the franchise’s real inheritance. Vice City would dress it in neon. San Andreas would give it scope. GTA V would hand it a Hollywood budget. But the swagger itself was born here, on a top-down map, in 1997.

You can build better graphics. You cannot retrofit a soul. GTA had one immediately.

---

👨 The Dad Angle — A History Lesson, Not a Family Night

Let me be clear about who this is for, because it is a small group.

Grand Theft Auto (1997) is not a game I would recommend you sit down and grind through for fun today. The honest 7 is a respect score, not a “go install this tonight” score. If you want to actually enjoy a GTA, start with the 3D-era games and work forward.

But for a certain kind of dad, the kind who grew up with these games and now wants to understand where the hobby they love actually came from, GTA 1 is a fascinating thirty-minute pilgrimage. It is the gaming equivalent of visiting the garage where the company started. You do not move in. You stand there for a moment, appreciate how far things have come, and leave.

On the kids question: despite the simple visuals, this is emphatically not a children’s game. It was rated for mature audiences in its day for a reason, the entire premise is crime and chaos. The cartoonish top-down look can fool a parent into thinking it is harmless. It is not aimed at children, and the simple graphics do not change the subject matter.

And there is a genuinely useful conversation buried in here for older kids who play modern GTA: showing them this original is a tidy way to explain that the games they take for granted, the vast cities, the cinematic stories, all of it grew out of something this small and this crude. Perspective is a good gift.

Ad

PlayStation 5 Console (opens in a new tab)

The console that plays today's open-world giants, the great-grandchildren of the little 1997 game reviewed here.

---

Where It All Began

The most important thing about Grand Theft Auto (1997) is also the simplest: it was first.

Every sprawling open world that followed, every city you have ever stolen a car in, every sandbox that handed you freedom and trusted you to find your own fun, traces back through a direct line to this little top-down game. DMA Design did not just make a hit. They lit a fuse.

The fuse burned slowly. The series would not truly explode into the cultural phenomenon we know until it found the third dimension a few years later. But the spark, the idea, the attitude, and the chaotic, multiplier-chasing heart of it, all of that was already alight in 1997.

That is why it earns a respectful 7 and not a dismissive lower score. Judged purely as a game to play in 2026, it is a fiddly, punishing relic. Judged as the origin point of the biggest sandbox in gaming, it is essential. Both of those things are true at once, and a good review has to hold both.

Respect the relic. Then go play one of its grandchildren.

---

---

FAQ

Is Grand Theft Auto (1997) worth playing today?

Only as a curiosity. The top-down visuals, fiddly controls, and brutal difficulty make it a relic to respect more than replay. Newcomers are far better served starting with the 3D-era games.

How is GTA 1 different from modern GTA games?

It is a 2D top-down game with no 3D cameras, no cinematic story, and no voiced protagonist. The core loop is chaotic free-roam crime and chasing score multipliers across a small city map.

Can you still buy the original GTA 1?

Not easily as a standalone physical product. It is best experienced through the franchise compilations or retro PC collections rather than the rare original discs.

Why does GTA 1 only get a 7 out of 10?

Because it is graded honestly as a relic. The crude top-down look, awkward controls, and unforgiving difficulty hold it back today, even though its influence on gaming is enormous.

Is GTA 1 appropriate for kids?

No. Even by 1997 standards it was rated for mature audiences for its crime and violence themes. Despite the simple visuals, it is not a children’s game.