Grand Theft Auto III Review: The Big Bang of the Modern Open World
GTA III dragged the series into full 3D and invented the modern open world. Historically towering, mechanically dated - an honest 8/10.
This post contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase, at no extra cost to you.
The Game That Changed Everything
🎮 This review is part of the The Grand Theft Auto Series – see every mainline GTA ranked and reviewed.
There are a handful of games you can point to and honestly say “everything after this was different.” Grand Theft Auto III is one of them.
Before GTA III, the series was a top-down, sprite-based curiosity - fun, chaotic, but firmly stuck in the 2D era. Then, in October 2001, DMA Design and Rockstar did something that genuinely felt impossible at the time. They took the formula, rebuilt it in full 3D, dropped you into a living city, and then did the most radical thing of all.
They just let you go.
No tutorial corridor. No invisible walls funneling you to the next cutscene. A whole city - Liberty City - laid out in front of you, with cars to steal, a map to learn, and missions you could take or ignore. The open-world sandbox, the thing an entire generation of games has been built on, effectively started here.
That is not nostalgia talking. That is history.
Liberty City: The First Real Sandbox
The star of GTA III is not the protagonist. It is the place.
Liberty City is a grimy, satirical version of New York, split across three islands that unlock as the story progresses. Portland is the industrial, mob-run opener. Staunton Island is the business and corruption district. Shoreside Vale is the suburban, airport-adjacent endgame.
What made this revolutionary was simple: it was a coherent city you could drive across in real time. Traffic flowed. Pedestrians walked the streets and reacted when you mowed them down. Police escalated their response as you caused more chaos, from a single cop on foot to roadblocks, the FBI, and eventually the army.
By the standards of 2001, this was science fiction. The idea that you could ignore the mission entirely, steal a sports car, and just see how long you could survive a five-star wanted level was the kind of emergent freedom no other game offered.
And critically, the city had personality. The radio stations alone - Head Radio, Flashback FM, Chatterbox talk radio with its unhinged callers - did more world-building than most games managed with full cutscenes. You learned what Liberty City was by driving through it with the radio on.
The Big Bang of the Modern Open World
It is hard to overstate how much of the modern open-world template was set right here.
The mission-from-a-contact structure. The wanted-level escalation. The “do whatever you want between objectives” freedom. The satirical, media-saturated city as character. Pick up almost any sandbox game from the last twenty years - Saints Row, Sleeping Dogs, Watch Dogs, even the way side content works in something like Spider-Man - and you are looking at descendants of GTA III.
Rockstar themselves spent the next two decades refining this exact formula. Vice City added neon and a soundtrack. San Andreas added scale and RPG systems. GTA IV added physics and pathos. GTA V added three protagonists and a generation-spanning online mode. But the DNA - the skeleton all of those are built on - was assembled in GTA III.
That is why this review exists in the first place. You cannot understand the franchise, or the genre, without understanding the game that fired the starting gun.
Ad
GTA: The Trilogy - Definitive Edition (opens in a new tab)
The easiest modern way to play GTA III, with updated visuals and controls on current consoles.
The Honest Problem: A Hero With No Voice
Here is where the clear-eyed part of the review begins, because devotion is not the same as a free pass.
You play as Claude, a getaway driver who is betrayed and left for dead by his girlfriend in the opening minutes. From there, Claude claws his way up through Liberty City’s criminal underworld, taking jobs for mobsters, cartel bosses, and assorted lunatics.
The problem? Claude never says a single word.
In 2001, a silent protagonist was defensible - a blank slate for the player to project onto. But play it today, after Niko Bellic, after Arthur Morgan, after John Marston, and the silence is deafening. Claude has no arc, no opinions, no humanity. People talk at him in cutscenes and he simply stands there. There is nobody to root for, nobody to understand, nobody to remember.
The world is full of character. The man at the center of it has none. And in a series that would later become defined by its protagonists, that absence is the single biggest reason this lands at an 8 rather than higher.
Combat and Controls That Show Their Age
The second honest problem is mechanical, and it is the kind of thing that does not get better with rose-tinted glasses.
The combat is clumsy. Aiming is imprecise, the auto-target lurches between enemies with a mind of its own, and gunfights frequently devolve into mashing fire and hoping. On foot, Claude moves like he is wading through wet cement. The driving holds up better - cars feel weighty and distinct, which is genuinely impressive for the era - but the moment you step out and have to shoot someone, the cracks show.
This was acceptable, even excusable, in 2001 when nothing else offered this kind of 3D freedom. Today, with decades of refinement behind us, the moment-to-moment feel is the part that most clearly screams “this is an old game.”
The Sin of No Checkpoints
If there is one design decision that defines how differently games were made in 2001, it is this: GTA III has no mid-mission checkpointing.
Fail a mission at the very last step - clip a wall in a getaway, get gunned down at the final objective, run out of time by seconds - and you do not retry from where you fell. You start the entire mission again. From the beginning. Including the boring drive across town to even reach the start of it.
For longer, multi-stage missions, this is genuinely punishing. It is the kind of friction that modern design solved years ago, and going back to it is a jarring reminder of how much patience games used to demand. It is not “hard” in a satisfying way. It is just tedious in a way that wastes your time.
For a busy dad with maybe an hour of gaming after the kids are down, redoing a fifteen-minute mission because of one mistake at the end is the fastest way to put the controller down for the night.
Ad
PlayStation 5 Console (opens in a new tab)
The current-gen home for the GTA back catalogue and whatever Rockstar ships next.
Tone, Satire, and the Mature Rating
What absolutely holds up is the attitude. GTA III is mean, funny, and gleefully cynical about American consumer culture, talk radio, organized crime, and politics. The satire is broad but sharp, and it set the tone the whole series would carry forward.
It is also unambiguously an M for Mature game. Violence, strong language, crime as the entire premise - this is not subtle, and it is not for kids. The original 2001 release drew plenty of moral-panic headlines, and while it looks tame compared to what came later, the core content is exactly what you would expect from the franchise.
This is firmly an after-bedtime game. Headphones on, radio up, kids asleep.
Why an 8 Is the Honest Score
Let me be clear about what an 8 means here, because it is doing two jobs at once.
On historical importance, GTA III is a 10 and then some. Few games have reshaped an entire medium this decisively. The modern open world exists because this game proved it could be done, and done well enough to sell millions.
But a review score is not a history grade. It is an answer to “what is it like to play this now?” And played today, the silent protagonist, the clumsy combat, and the missing checkpoints drag the experience down from monumental to merely interesting. It is a museum piece you can still enjoy, not a game that competes with its own descendants.
An 8 honors what GTA III achieved while being honest about what it is to actually sit down and play it in 2026. Anything higher would be nostalgia. Anything lower would ignore that without this game, none of what came after would exist.
👨 The Dad Angle - Should You Revisit It?
If you played GTA III as a teenager in the early 2000s, going back is a genuinely interesting experience - a chance to see how much both you and the genre have grown. The radio stations alone will throw you straight back. But manage your expectations: the magic was in being first, and you cannot un-experience everything that came after.
If you have never played it and you are curious where the modern open world came from, GTA III is essential viewing in the way a film student watches Citizen Kane. Not because it is the most enjoyable thing you will play this year, but because it explains everything that followed. Play the Definitive Edition, accept the rough edges as historical texture, and treat it as a lesson rather than a competition with GTA V.
Either way, keep your sessions short, save often between missions, and do not be surprised when a single failed mission at 11pm convinces you to call it a night.
Pros
- Genuinely invented the modern open-world sandbox
- Liberty City is a coherent, characterful living city
- Radio stations and satire still land beautifully
- Surprisingly solid, weighty driving model for 2001
- Essential historical context for the entire genre
Cons
- Silent protagonist Claude has no character to latch onto
- No mid-mission checkpointing - fail at the end, redo it all
- Clumsy combat and imprecise aiming have aged badly
- On-foot movement feels stiff and dated
Final Verdict
Grand Theft Auto III is one of the most important games ever made. It dragged the series into full 3D, dropped you into Liberty City, and invented the template that every sandbox since has copied.
But historical importance and a great modern play session are two different things. The silent Claude gives you nobody to care about, the combat is clumsy, and the lack of checkpoints turns failure into busywork.
Towering in history. Dated in your hands. That is an honest 8.
Final Rating: 8/10 - Revolutionary Then, A Museum Piece Now
FAQ
Is Grand Theft Auto III worth playing today?
Why does the protagonist never speak?
Does GTA III have mission checkpoints?
What is the best way to play GTA III in 2026?
Is GTA III suitable for kids?
Disclaimer: This review and its visuals were created with the help of AI. Some links may be affiliate links – we may earn a commission if you make a purchase, at no extra cost to you.
You might also like
Grand Theft Auto (1997) Review: Where the Biggest Sandbox in Gaming Began
An honest 7. Grand Theft Auto (1997) is a crude top-down relic with fiddly controls and brutal difficulty, but its chaotic sandbox attitude lit the fuse for an entire genre.
Grand Theft Auto IV Review: The Grown-Up GTA That Grew a Conscience
An honest 9/10. GTA IV is the grown-up, grounded entry in the series: a brilliant immigrant tragedy in a reborn Liberty City, held back only by its dour tone, weighty driving, and a phone that never stops ringing.
Grand Theft Auto 2 Review: The Last Word in Top-Down Crime
An honest 7/10. GTA 2 is the most refined top-down GTA, with a brilliant gang-respect hook, but crude 2D visuals and punishing save design hold it back today.