Batman v Superman Review: The Ideas Are There. So Is the Mess.
Ben Affleck is a revelation as Batman, Gal Gadot announces herself as Wonder Woman, and the ideas are genuinely ambitious — but the execution is a compromised, overstuffed mess. 7/10.
This post contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase, at no extra cost to you.
🦸 This review is part of the The Old DCEU – Every Film Reviewed – watch every DCEU film from Man of Steel to the finale (2013–2023).
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice is the most frustrating major superhero film of the past decade — not because it fails, but because it contains the bones of something genuinely extraordinary, and then proceeds to bury them under studio anxiety, franchise obligations, and a third act that seemingly belongs to a different film. There is a great movie here. It is fighting, constantly, to get out.
AdBatman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (4K Ultra HD) (opens in a new tab)
Get the Ultimate Edition — it adds 30 minutes that make the film coherent. The theatrical cut is the inferior experience.
Let’s start with what’s undeniably right. Ben Affleck’s Bruce Wayne is the best live-action version of the character in cinema history. This is not faint praise. Where the Keaton and Bale Batmans were interpretations of the myth, Affleck’s is something more specific and more disturbing: a man in his mid-forties who has fought Gotham’s darkness for twenty years and lost. He’s drinking more. He brands criminals — burns his bat symbol into flesh — which the film treats as a sign of his moral decay. He has nightmares. His butler Alfred (Jeremy Irons, wry and brilliant) delivers the franchise’s most incisive line of dialogue: “The fever — the rage — the feeling of powerlessness that turns good men cruel.” Affleck understood exactly what kind of story he was in, and delivered accordingly.
Jesse Eisenberg’s Lex Luthor divides audiences cleanly in half. His interpretation — a manic, twitching tech-genius with a pathological fear of god-figures — is either a brilliant reconceptualization of the character or an irritating performance that hijacks every scene he enters. I land on the former, mostly: Eisenberg is doing something specific and deliberate, and the Ultimate Edition makes his manipulation of both Bruce Wayne and Superman more coherent than the theatrical cut allows. He’s not the bald corporate villain of comics lore. He’s a brilliant, deeply damaged man who cannot tolerate the existence of a being who answers to no human authority.
Narrative Architecture: God vs Man
The film’s central question is genuinely interesting: in a world where a being of limitless power exists, what does justice mean? Bruce Wayne watched the Battle of Metropolis from the street in Man of Steel. He watched Superman and Zod tear his city’s buildings apart while his employees died. From his angle, Superman is a god-figure with no accountability — and the only rational response to an omnipotent alien is to prepare a weapon capable of killing one. The film earns this logic. It doesn’t ask you to agree with Bruce, but it asks you to understand him.
Clark Kent’s parallel story — Superman navigating a world that simultaneously worships and fears him, facing Senate hearings and Lois Lane investigations and the emerging threat of Lex’s manipulation — is less coherent in the theatrical cut but considerably stronger in the Ultimate Edition. The key addition is a subplot involving Senator Finch’s investigation into Superman’s activities that gives the political thriller dimension of the story the time it needs.
| Bruce Wayne / Batman | Clark Kent / Superman | |
|---|---|---|
| Worldview | Power must be checked — always | Power must be earned — through restraint |
| Fear | Superman as unaccountable god | Batman as a broken, violent vigilante |
| Method | Preparation, contingency, weaponry | Restraint, until provoked beyond bearing |
| Defining Moment | Brands criminals, plans to kill Superman | Flies into the Senate hearing to defend himself |
| What changes | The lesson that monsters are made, not born | The limit of one man's willingness to sacrifice |
The warehouse fight sequence — Batman dismantling twenty armed men to reach a hostage — is legitimately one of the best action sequences in superhero cinema. It’s choreographed as brutal, purposeful violence, not balletic superhero theatrics. The sound design is extraordinary. Affleck moves like a force of nature. It’s exactly the Batman fight we spent decades wanting to see.
The Gal Gadot Problem (That Isn’t a Problem)
Gal Gadot appears in Batman v Superman for roughly fifteen minutes and owns every second of them. Her Diana Prince is mysterious, slightly amused, utterly competent, and — when the armored Batman and Superman are both struggling against Doomsday — the one who steps forward without hesitation. Her theme, the electric cello and distorted guitar piece by Junkie XL, is the best individual character motif in any DC film. The moment she deflects Doomsday’s energy blast and smiles? Cinemas cheered. Deservedly.
AdDC Multiverse Armored Batman (BvS) Figure (opens in a new tab)
The armored Batman suit from the big fight sequence is one of the most iconic DC designs of the decade. Excellent desk presence.
The problem is Doomsday. The third act of this film — the arrival of a CGI Doomsday, a creature that looks like a cave troll in a suit, triggering a lengthy spectacle battle — is where Batman v Superman unravels. Lex Luthor’s plan, which required complex manipulation of two heroes over the course of the film, suddenly requires them to fight a mindless monster instead of each other, and the film’s genuine ambitions dissolve into generic superhero slugging. The character death that ends the sequence — which the marketing spoiled in advance, compounding the problem — lands with less emotional impact than it should because the film hasn’t quite earned it in the theatrical cut.
The Snyder Vision vs Studio Reality
Batman v Superman is the clearest visible example of the tension between Zack Snyder’s ambitions and Warner Bros.’ fears. The theatrical cut shows the signs of studio anxiety: subplots cut without their resolutions, dream sequences that feel unexplained, Justice League setup footage (Diana watching video files of Flash, Aquaman, and Cyborg) that belongs in a post-credits sequence but is dropped mid-film. The Ultimate Edition restores what should have been there all along. Running 30 minutes longer, it makes the Africa sequence coherent, gives Clark’s investigation of Batman actual screen time, and restores Lex Luthor’s plan to something a viewer can follow without pausing to re-examine the plot.
Watch the Ultimate Edition. The theatrical cut is the lesser experience by a significant margin, and the R-rated version — which earned its rating through a handful of additional intense moments — demonstrates that Snyder’s real intentions for this franchise were considerably more interesting than what WB permitted.
AdBatman v Superman: Dawn of Justice – Ultimate Edition (Blu-ray) (opens in a new tab)
The R-rated, 182-minute cut that Snyder intended. Genuinely a better film than what hit theatres.
Pros
- Ben Affleck's Batman is the definitive live-action version — older, broken, and genuinely menacing
- The warehouse fight sequence is one of the best Batman action scenes ever filmed
- Gal Gadot's Wonder Woman debut is electrifying despite limited screen time
- Jesse Eisenberg's unhinged Lex Luthor is a bold, divisive, and oddly compelling interpretation
- The Ultimate Edition is a meaningfully better film — coherent and more emotionally satisfying
Cons
- The theatrical cut is visibly compromised — subplots truncated, character motivations unclear
- The third-act Doomsday sequence abandons the film's ambitions for generic spectacle
- A major character death that should land hard is defused by marketing and rushed execution
- The Justice League setup footage feels like a different film's deleted scene dropped mid-story
Conclusion: The Best Bad Film in the DCEU
Batman v Superman is a 7/10 film that contains, scattered throughout its two competing versions, the bones of something that could have been a 9. Ben Affleck’s Batman alone justifies its existence. The ambitions — using superhero mythology to interrogate questions of power, accountability, and the nature of justice — are rare and genuine. But the execution, particularly in the theatrical cut, is a compromise between a filmmaker’s vision and a studio’s fear of their own franchise.
Watch the Ultimate Edition. See Affleck’s performance properly contextualized. Recognize Eisenberg’s Lex for the specific, deliberate choice it is. And forgive the Doomsday sequence, or at least understand it as evidence of the creative tension that eventually fractured this universe entirely.
The Final Word: A genuinely compelling failure. The Ultimate Edition is a must-watch for anyone building through the DCEU; the theatrical cut is worth skipping in favour of it.
Should I watch the theatrical or Ultimate Edition of Batman v Superman?
Is Ben Affleck's Batman good?
Who directed Batman v Superman?
Is Batman v Superman suitable for kids?
Disclaimer: This review and its visuals were created with the help of AI. Some links may be affiliate links – we may earn a commission if you make a purchase, at no extra cost to you.
You might also like
Dune (2021) Review: The Sci-Fi Epic That Got It Right
Dune (2021) is the adaptation fans waited 40 years for: vast, patient, and overwhelmingly immersive. A 10/10, and only the first half of one of the best cinematic experiences of the decade.
Dune: Part Two Review: The Sequel That Perfects the Epic
Dune: Part Two is the rarest thing in modern cinema, a sequel that surpasses a near-perfect original. The sandworm ride alone is worth the price of entry. A flawless 10/10.
Ghost Rider (2007) Review: Cage's Flaming Guilty Pleasure
Ghost Rider (2007) is comfort-food cinema — not a good film in any serious sense, but Nicolas Cage's unstoppable commitment to the bit makes it an irresistible guilty pleasure. The flaming skull still looks cool. The villain still looks forgettable. Nostalgic 7/10.