Toy Story (1995) Review: The One That Started Everything
The 1995 Pixar original that rewrote the rules of animation and told a story about jealousy, friendship, and being replaced that hits differently when you are a dad.
This post contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase, at no extra cost to you.
There is a specific kind of cinema magic that does not wear out. The kind where the craft is so honest and the characters so precisely drawn that three decades of technological change cannot touch the emotional core. Toy Story (1995) belongs to that category. It was revolutionary in 1995. In 2026, watching it with your own child on your lap, it is something different entirely — it is a mirror held up to every fear a parent quietly carries.
Pixar’s founding film had every reason to coast on its technical achievement. The world’s first computer-animated feature film arriving at a moment when audiences were still processing the implications of what they were seeing. Instead, John Lasseter and his team made a film about jealousy. About insecurity. About the terror of being replaced by something newer, shinier, and more exciting than you. In 1995 that was Woody discovering Buzz Lightyear. In 2026 that theme has a second layer that no eight-year-old can access but every parent understands immediately.
AdToy Story (4K Ultra HD + Blu-ray) (opens in a new tab)
The definitive home release. The 4K restoration does justice to the groundbreaking animation and Randy Newman's score fills the room properly.
The film arrived in November 1995 with a box office that confirmed Pixar had changed the industry permanently. What is more remarkable is that the storytelling ambition matched the technological ambition. Toy Story is not a showcase for a new technique. It is a film that uses a new technique in service of something genuinely felt.
For fathers, the key to why this film still works is in a scene that happens before Buzz even arrives. Woody is Andy’s favourite. His name is written on the boot. He runs the bedroom. And you watch a child love a toy with uncomplicated certainty, and somewhere in the back of your brain you file away the knowledge that this exact dynamic — being someone’s whole world for a specific window of time — is both the gift of parenthood and its fundamental grief.
The Jealousy Engine: What Toy Story Is Really About
John Lasseter wanted Woody to be a villain at first. The early test screenings confirmed what the script supervisor kept raising: Woody was too unlikeable, too threatened, too transparently jealous. The production paused, the character was rebuilt, and the result is something more interesting than a villain — a protagonist who acts badly for entirely understandable reasons.
Woody is the established favourite who discovers that being the favourite is not a permanent state. Buzz Lightyear arrives — delusional, confident, technically impressive in ways Woody cannot compete with — and Andy immediately transfers his attention. Woody’s response is petty, resentful, and in one key scene, directly harmful. The film does not let him off the hook. It also does not stop you from understanding him completely.
Buzz, meanwhile, genuinely believes he is a Space Ranger. Tim Allen’s performance in this role is one of the most underrated in animation history: he plays the delusion with total sincerity and the collapse of that delusion with real grief. The moment Buzz realizes he is a toy — when he watches a television commercial for himself — is played not for laughs but for something closer to tragedy.
The genius of the film is that these two characters, who should be incompatible, discover they need each other. Woody’s practical knowledge of how the world actually works. Buzz’s willingness to attempt things that defy probability. The friendship that develops between them is earned through genuine conflict rather than shortcut sentimentality.
AdWoody Pull-String Sheriff Doll (opens in a new tab)
The classic collectible. Still the best way to re-enact the scene where Woody discovers his pull-string is broken. Your kid will want one immediately.
For dads watching with school-age children, the film generates conversations that no amount of deliberate “educational content” can manufacture. Why did Woody push Buzz out the window? What would you do if someone new arrived and everyone liked them more than you? Is it okay to feel jealous? The answers to those questions, delivered by a six-year-old halfway through a bowl of popcorn, are worth more than any structured discussion.
The Animation: Revolutionary Then, Surprisingly Dignified Now
CGI from 1995 does not age well as a category. The humans in Toy Story — Andy, his mother, Sid, the other children — look exactly as rough as thirty-year-old computer graphics should. They are stiff, plastic-looking in all the wrong ways, and the temptation to view them through contemporary eyes as a technical limitation is strong.
What Pixar understood was that this limitation was, for their story, entirely invisible. The toys do not need to look photorealistic. They ARE toys. The plastic sheen on Buzz’s helmet, the worn texture on Woody’s hat, the precise mechanical articulation of Rex’s jaw — these are features, not bugs. The film is set in a world of manufactured objects, and the aesthetic of CGI in 1995 matched that world with accidental perfection.
The environments hold up remarkably. Andy’s bedroom — the first truly landmark CGI interior in cinema — remains a place you can orient yourself in after a single viewing. Sid’s bedroom, lit from a single green-tinged light source and cluttered with half-dismantled electronics and craft experiments, is a masterclass in using limited polygon counts to create genuine atmosphere. The production design team made decisions that continue to reward attention thirty years later.
Randy Newman’s score deserves its own paragraph. “You’ve Got a Friend in Me” is one of those songs that sounds cheerful on first listen and then, if you are a parent in your late thirties watching it for the fifth time, reveals itself to be a precise description of the parent-child relationship. The warmth. The commitment. The slightly desperate edge to the pledge of friendship. Newman earned his Oscar nomination. The full score — underused in subsequent discussion of the film — is among his finest work.
The Sid Section: The Part Your Kids Were Not Warned About
Sid Phillips is the villain of Toy Story in the way that a real child is sometimes a villain: through a combination of cruelty, boredom, and no external consequence. He lives next door to Andy. He uses his sister’s toys as experimental subjects. His bedroom is a chamber of horrors assembled from the remains of previous toys that did not survive his attention.
The mutant toys Sid has created — a head stitched onto a spider’s legs, a doll’s face on a mechanical vehicle, a torso pulling itself across the floor — are presented in low lighting with horror-film framing. The sequence where they approach Woody in the dark is one of the most genuinely frightening things in the Pixar catalogue. It is deliberately horror-adjacent and the film knows it.
The resolution — the toys coming alive to terrify Sid into never harming toys again — is cathartic and darkly funny for older viewers. For a four-year-old who had not been warned about what Sid’s room contained, it is a different experience. The 6+ guidance is not conservative; it reflects what the film actually does in that sequence.
AdToy Story (Blu-ray) (opens in a new tab)
The reliable all-rounder. Sharp, faithful to the original theatrical release, and the bonus features are worth the disc price alone.
This is worth saying out loud because Toy Story’s general reputation as wholesome family entertainment can create the impression that it is appropriate for any age. It is not. It is appropriate for children who can handle the genuine menace of what Sid represents and the visual unease of his creations. Most children over six manage it fine. Most children under four do not.
The Dad Angle: Being Replaced by Something Newer
There is a scene in the third act of Toy Story where Woody, stranded in Sid’s house, watches through the window as Buzz — the replacement he resented — is played with by Andy in the garden. Woody’s face does not express anger any more. It expresses something closer to grief, and a specific kind of grief: the grief of someone watching the window close.
Thirty years later, that scene means something different to the parent in the room. Because you know, watching your own child grow up, that windows close. That the version of you who runs the bedroom — whose name is written in the boot — exists for a specific period and then the world expands past you. Not because you failed. Simply because that is what children are supposed to do.
That theme is present in every Toy Story film. The first one plants it in a moment of pure jealousy. By the third film it has become the entire story. But it starts here, in 1995, in a film about a cowboy doll and a delusional spaceman, and the fact that it was emotionally precise enough to do that in a children’s animated film is the reason Toy Story stands apart from almost everything that followed.
Pros
- Genuinely emotionally intelligent storytelling — not just for children
- Tom Hanks and Tim Allen deliver performances worth the word 'performances'
- Randy Newman's score and 'You've Got a Friend in Me' are flawless
- The animation has aged far better than any other 1995 CGI feature
- Sid's section is genuine filmmaking craft — horror that earns its place
Cons
- The human characters look their age — stiff 1995 CGI that has not been kind
- The Sid section genuinely frightens younger or sensitive children — know this before sitting a 4-year-old down
- The airport finale feels slightly rushed compared to the meticulous first two acts
Conclusion: The One That Started Everything
Thirty years on, Toy Story (1995) remains the argument for animation as a serious storytelling medium. Not because of its technical achievement — though that was seismic — but because John Lasseter and his team understood that the story had to do the work. Woody’s jealousy, Buzz’s delusion, and the friendship that forms between them in spite of themselves: these are real characters in a real story about real human fears dressed up in plastic and stitched together with Randy Newman’s warmth.
For dads specifically, this film has a second life that was not available when you first saw it. The themes of being replaced, of loving something for a finite window, of watching the world expand past the version of yourself it once loved — they land differently when you are the parent and not the child. Toy Story holds your eight-year-old’s hand while quietly breaking yours.
The Final Word: A 9/10 is the correct rating for Toy Story and it is not close. If you have not watched it with your own children, fix that this weekend. Just prepare them for Sid.
Is Toy Story (1995) still worth watching?
Is Toy Story suitable for very young children?
What is Toy Story actually about?
Who directed Toy Story (1995)?
Disclaimer: This review and its visuals were created with the help of AI. Some links may be affiliate links – we may earn a commission if you make a purchase, at no extra cost to you.
You might also like
The Legend of Vox Machina Season 1 Review: The Best Series Premiere in Years
A perfect animated series premiere. The first episode alone sets a new bar for how you hook an audience. Coming in blind, no D&D experience needed — it grabs you instantly and never lets go.
The Legend of Vox Machina Season 2 Review: Still Brilliant, Even Deeper
The Chroma Conclave arc is a worthy escalation — deeper character work, higher stakes, and the same razor-sharp humor that made Season 1 a 10. A brilliant season that earns its 9.
The Legend of Vox Machina Season 3 Review: A Worthy, Slightly Uneven Finale
A worthy finale to the trilogy — the ambition occasionally outruns the pacing, but the character payoffs and humor are still excellent. Season 3 earns its 8 through commitment and genuine heart.