Is 007 First Light a Prequel to the Films? Welcome to the Bond Multiverse
007 First Light is Bond's origin story — but it's NOT a prequel to the Craig films. Here's why 007 is now a multiverse, and how the game fits into it.
This post contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase, at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, Dadnology earns from qualifying purchases.
TL;DR – The One-Minute Answer
So you finished — or are about to start — IO Interactive’s 007 First Light, the game that finally tells the origin of James Bond: how a reckless, gifted young recruit earns his 00 status and becomes the agent the world fears. And a very reasonable question follows: is this a prequel to the films? Does young video-game Bond grow up into Daniel Craig?
The short answer is no. And the longer answer is far more interesting — because it turns out James Bond has quietly become exactly the kind of thing Marvel and DC fans have argued about for years: a multiverse.
Ad007 First Light (PlayStation 5) (opens in a new tab)
IO Interactive's young-Bond origin story — a fresh continuity all its own, and the newest branch of the Bond multiverse.
Series Content
Explore all articles, reviews, and guides in this series.
“007 First Light is IO Interactive's first James Bond game, a third-person stealth-action origin story we played on PS5. A young 00-agent, a sandbox full of Q-gadgets, and missions you can finish in a single evening. We test it against the only benchmark that matters for a busy dad: can you slip into Bond's shoes for one 45-minute session, nail the job, and switch off without losing the thread? The answer is a confident yes — minor AI lapses and base-PS5 resolution dips aside, this is the best Bond game since GoldenEye.”
“Casino Royale (2006) is the film that saved James Bond by stripping him back to basics: no invisible cars, no gadget overload, just a raw, newly-minted 00-agent, a poker game with national stakes, and a romance that actually costs him something. Martin Campbell directs Daniel Craig's debut with a grounded seriousness the franchise badly needed. As a dad who's honestly lukewarm on the Craig era as a whole, this is the entry I have no reservations about — tight, brutal, and emotionally earned. An 8/10 and the high-water mark of the run.”
“Quantum of Solace (2008) is the black sheep of the Daniel Craig era — and we think it's underrated. Picking up minutes after Casino Royale, it's the franchise's only true direct sequel: a tight, furious 106-minute revenge picture about a Bond still bleeding from Vesper's death. The choppy editing and the maligned Bolivia plot are real flaws, but the emotional throughline is honest and the lean runtime is a gift in an era of bloated blockbusters. As a dad who's lukewarm on the wider Craig run, this grief-fueled sprint earns an 8/10 from us.”
“Skyfall (2012) is the most beloved film of the Daniel Craig era and, for a lot of people, the best Bond full stop. Roger Deakins shoots it like a work of art, Javier Bardem's Silva is a magnetic villain, and the emotional farewell to Judi Dench's M genuinely lands. So why only a 7 from us? Because for a spy series that asks to be taken seriously, Silva's master plan is a house of cards — it only works if every single person, train, and explosion behaves exactly as a man in a cell could never guarantee. Gorgeous and gripping, but the logic holes are too big to ignore.”
“Spectre (2015) opens with one of the greatest single shots in the franchise and casts Christoph Waltz as the ultimate Bond villain — and then spends two and a half hours squandering both. Sam Mendes returns, the Rome and Austria sequences look magnificent, but the script makes a fatal choice: it retcons every Daniel Craig film into the secret work of one man, and reveals Blofeld to be Bond's jealous foster-brother. For a series that takes itself seriously, that soap-opera contrivance — plus a romance that ignites in a single afternoon — is too much to swallow. A handsome, frustrating 7/10.”
“No Time to Die (2021) had to do the impossible: end Daniel Craig's 15-year run and break the one rule the franchise never breaks. To its enormous credit, it takes a genuinely brave swing, delivering the most emotionally daring finale in Bond history. Cary Joji Fukunaga directs with scale and a few standout sequences. But for a series that takes itself seriously, the plot leans on a hazy nanobot bioweapon and a villain in Rami Malek's Safin whose plan and motivation never quite cohere. The emotional ending lands; the machinery getting there wobbles. A bold, flawed 7/10.”
Disclaimer: This review and its visuals were created with the help of AI. Some links may be affiliate links – we may earn a commission if you make a purchase, at no extra cost to you.
First, the Direct Answer: No, It’s Not a Prequel
007 First Light shares three things with the Daniel Craig films: the name James Bond, the 00 iconography, and a grounded tone. That’s it. It does not lead into Casino Royale. The young Bond you play is not a younger version of Craig’s Bond, Brosnan’s Bond, or anyone else’s. IO Interactive built a fresh, self-contained continuity — its own canon, with its own version of Q, M, and the wider MI6 world.
This is a deliberate, smart choice. Tying the game to the film timeline would have shackled it to decades of contradictory on-screen history. Instead, IO did what every confident reboot does: it kept the essence of Bond — the character, the danger, the style — and threw out the baggage. (We dug into how well it pulls that off, and how it stacks up against the N64 legend, in our GoldenEye vs First Light piece.)
Bond Was Never a Single Canon to Begin With
Here’s the part that surprises people: even before the game, “the James Bond continuity” was a polite fiction. There has never been one clean, continuous Bond story.
Consider the evidence:
- The Daniel Craig films are a reboot. Casino Royale (2006) explicitly restarts the clock, showing Bond earning his 00 status as if no prior film existed. Craig’s five films — from Casino Royale through No Time to Die — form one self-contained arc that ignores everything before it.
- The classic films are their own loose tangle. The Connery, Lazenby, Moore, Dalton, and Brosnan eras span 40 years, recast Bond six times, and contradict each other constantly. They’re connected by vibe and recurring characters (M, Q, Moneypenny), not by any rigorous timeline.
- The novels are a third thing. Ian Fleming’s 14 books are the source code, but the films diverged from them almost immediately and never looked back.
Fans even invented the famous “James Bond is a codename” theory to paper over the cracks — the idea that 007 is a title passed between agents, which is why he keeps changing face and never seems to age across sixty years. It was never official. But it points at the truth: Bond has always been a legend retold, not a single man with one continuous life.
So Welcome to the Bond Multiverse
Once you accept that, 007 First Light stops being confusing and starts being obvious. It’s simply the newest branch on a tree that already had several.
| Branch | Bond Version | Continuity |
|---|---|---|
| Classic Films (1962-2002) | Connery to Brosnan | Loose, 40-year shared canon |
| Craig Films (2006-2021) | Daniel Craig | Self-contained reboot |
| The Novels | Fleming's literary Bond | Original source, its own thing |
| 007 First Light (2026) | IO's young game Bond | Brand-new standalone canon |
This is the model Batman fans have lived with for decades. Nobody asks whether the Christopher Nolan Batman, the Robert Pattinson Batman, and the Arkham video-game Batman are the same person — they’re parallel interpretations of one icon, each great in its own lane. Spider-Man’s “Spider-Verse” made the idea literal and won an Oscar for it. Bond has now joined that club, just without the on-screen portal effects.
AdDaniel Craig James Bond 4K Collection (opens in a new tab)
The five-film Craig continuity in 4K — its own self-contained reboot, separate again from the classic films and the game.
How to Enjoy It: No Homework Required
The genuinely liberating part of a multiverse is that it removes the pressure to reconcile anything. You don’t need to play the game to understand the films, or watch the films to enjoy the game. There’s no required viewing order, no canon to keep straight, no continuity exam at the end.
Treat them as what they are: different artists’ takes on the same legend. Have an evening for IO Interactive’s grounded, stealth-driven young Bond. Have another for Craig’s brutal, emotional reboot — flawed plotting and all (we were honest about the logic holes in the later films). Have a third for Connery’s effortless cool. They don’t compete; they coexist. That’s the whole point of a multiverse — more Bond, less bookkeeping.
If anything, the multiverse framing is a gift to a busy dad. It means you can hand a newcomer whichever version fits the moment without a lecture on continuity. Want a tense 90-minute weeknight watch? Quantum of Solace. Want to actually play as Bond after the kids are down? First Light. Want to show a teenager how tension is built without a single explosion? Casino Royale. None of these choices is “wrong,” and none of them spoils another. The franchise has quietly become a buffet rather than a fixed menu — and once you stop trying to make the dishes into a single meal, the whole thing gets a lot more enjoyable. That, ultimately, is why the game choosing its own continuity is something to celebrate rather than untangle.
Pros
- A standalone game canon frees First Light from sixty years of contradictory film history
- Multiple continuities mean more variety — grounded game Bond, brutal Craig Bond, classic Connery Bond
- No required order or canon homework: every version stands fully on its own
- It matches how fans already enjoy Batman and Spider-Man across separate universes
Cons
- Newcomers may briefly expect the game and films to connect when they don't
- Purists who want one definitive Bond timeline won't find it here — and never really could
The Bottom Line
No, 007 First Light is not a prequel to the Daniel Craig films — and that’s a good thing. It’s a fresh origin story in its own continuity, the newest version of a character who has been reinvented, recast, and rebooted for over six decades.
The honest truth is that James Bond was always a multiverse waiting for someone to say it out loud. The films were never one timeline; the novels were a separate root; and now a video game has added a confident new branch. Stop trying to fit them together, and you’re free to enjoy all of them. More Bond, no homework.
Our full reviews of the game and every Daniel Craig film appear below — the complete Bond multiverse, rated and broken down.